Shared January 8, 2020
Made-for-tv-marriages to immigrate to the US? Sound too good to be true?
Legal Eagles get 2 months of unlimited learning on Skillshare for FREE: https://skl.sh/legaleagle22
From TLC’s description of the show:
Long-distance relationships have challenges that are sometimes difficult to overcome but consider if the distance traveled was halfway around the world and a couple had just 90 days to decide whether the courtship should conclude with marriage. That's the situation facing the men and women profiled in this series, which shares the complexities of international romances. Using a visa that allows foreign fiancees of American citizens to travel to the U.S., the men and women experience life in the States with their prospective mates for the first time. Culture and language barriers must be overcome -- not to mention the stigma of being thought of as mail-order spouses -- but here's the elephant in the room: The couples must marry before the visas expire in 90 days, or else the visitors have to immediately return to their countries. With the clock ticking, these couples discover if their "happily ever after" is meant to be.
(Thanks to Skillshare for sponsoring this video)
Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ https://twitter.com/legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglere...
★ Stella’s Insta: https://www.instagram.com/stellathele...
★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: email@example.com
Lawyer Responds: John Oliver SLAPPs Back? (Real Law Review)
90 Day Fiance S7 Tell All Pt.1 REVIEW #90DayFiance
The Worst Scams on 90 Day Fiance
90 Day Fiancé S07E14 Pillow Talk TELL ALL PART 1 (Feb 16, 2020)
Real Lawyer Reacts to Reynolds v. Reynolds (Cereal Defense) It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
15 Strict Rules 90 Day Fiancé Cast Are Forced To Follow
Gwyneth Paltrow's Netflix Series is Stupid and Harmful | Cynical Reviews
Bad r/Legaladvice - Deleting Emails to Avoid Subpoena
Hillary Clinton Defames Tulsi Gabbard or SLAPP LOLsuit? - Real Law Review
Real Lawyer Reacts to The Simpsons (Itchy & Scratchy Trial)
Real Doctor Reacts to HOUSE M.D. | Medical Drama Review | Doctor Mike
Real Lawyer Reacts to The Good Wife
Real Lawyer Reacts to The Social Network (Full Movie) // LegalEagle
Real Lawyer Reacts to South Park Chewbacca Defense
Top 10 90 Day Fiancé Couples That Are Still Together
Laws Broken: Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory
Real Lawyer Reacts to Suits (full episode)
YouTuber Extortion? MxR Plays v. Jukin - Real Law Review // LegalEagle